Sunday, May 15, 2011

Why Joey Votto is the best First Baseman in Basebal


                Last week I wrote about Joey Votto's streak of avoiding pop outs which has continued for five more games since I wrote that post (187 games across 2010/2011).  I recently read an article by Mike Axisa on Rotographs where he made an argument that Pujols was still the best first baseman and Votto was a close 2nd.  Mike was evaluating from a fantasy baseball perspective so he is not necessarily saying who is the best player but who is the best fantasy player.  But as a Reds fan anytime a Cardinal is found to be better than a Red I feel a fundamental law of the universe has been broken. So I am going to look deeper in the stats to find the inevitable truth that Joey Votto is the best first baseman in baseball.
                There are two other first basemen who have the honor of even being mentioned in the same sentence as Votto when talking about best first basemen, Albert Pujols and Miguel Cabrera.  I'm going to look just at hitting since that is what makes a great first baseman.  We'll look at 3 layers of performance. We will look first at end results, then batted balls, and finally the at the plate.  That should give us a full picture of what these three stars do and how they do it. 


The Results
                First let's start with a chart of the three players on a total offensive statistic.  Let's use WOBA from FanGraphs.  Even if you don't know what wOBA is (Here is an explanation) you can see all three players are firmly in the good range.  Pujols has been the best for a long time but in 2010 and 2011 he has been passed up.  Votto last year had a year comparable to the early 2000 Pujols and seems to be sustaining it in 2011.  So even if Pujols bounces back they are close.  Cabrera had his best year last year but just does not seem to be able to reach the same level Pujols and Votto have.  





The ZiPS projection for the remainder of the season also has Votto slightly on top.
Votto - 416 wOBA (310/409/549)
Pujols - 410 wOBA (305/408/563)
Cabrera - 409 wOBA (304/398/560)



Batted Ball
                One level deeper than results is what do they do when they make contact.  From the table below we see that Votto tends to be more of a line drive hitter.  All three have great HR/FB ratios in the 19-20% range versus a league average of 10.5%.  But given Cabrera/Pujols will hit more fly balls they will hit more home runs while Votto is the better pure hitter with his high line drive rate. Couple this table with the fact that Votto never pops out we have to give the edge to Votto for the quality of his hits when he makes contact.



LD%
GB%
FB%
HR/FB
Votto
2010
20.0%
45.2%
34.8%
25.0%

2011
27.8%
42.6%
29.6%
15.6%

Career
22.9%
42.2%
34.9%
19.6%
Cabrera
2010
18.9%
39.3%
41.7%
19.8%

2011
19.6%
47.3%
33.0%
18.9%

Career
21.1%
41.6%
37.3%
18.4%
Pujols
2010
17.2%
38.3%
44.5%
18.3%

2011
14.9%
50.7%
34.3%
15.2%

Career
19.1%
40.8%
40.1%
19.8%

Pitch by Pitch
                The final look is what happens at the plate.  The first chart is looking at plate discipline.  This chart shows a pretty clear order with Pujols the most patient, Cabrera the least, with Votto in the middle.  Votto and Cabrera actually swing more than league average (45.6% in 2010).   One other interesting thing is of the three it seems the league is most willing to throw to Pujols probably because he chases outside so rarely.


O-Swing%
Z-Swing%
Swing%
Zone%
Votto
2010
29.9%
72.9%
47.9%
41.8%

2011
26.1%
65.7%
42.7%
41.9%

Career
26.8%
72.7%
47.5%
45.2%
Cabrera
2010
32.7%
74.1%
50.2%
42.4%

2011
29.2%
73.7%
46.9%
39.8%

Career
28.0%
70.7%
49.1%
49.5%
Pujols
2010
27.5%
63.0%
43.2%
44.2%

2011
21.3%
61.2%
40.1%
47.3%

Career
20.3%
65.3%
42.2%
48.8%

O-Swing% - % of time swing at pitch outside strike zone.
Z-Swing% - % of time swing at pitch inside strike zone.
Swing% - % of time swing at pitch
Zone% - % of pitches in strike zone.

                The final thing to look at is contact rates when they do swing.  If you were wondering what makes Pujols special I think we found it.  He is making contact far more often and in fact he is in the top 25 in MLB over 2010/2011 in contact %.  Votto and Cabrera are both a bit below average (80.7% in 2010) in contact %.   



O-Contact%
Z-Contact%
Contact%
SwStr%
Votto
2010
69.4%
82.4%
77.7%
10.4%

2011
69.5%
86.1%
80.2%
8.3%

Career
62.9%
83.7%
77.3%
10.4%
Cabrera
2010
67.6%
86.0%
79.1%
9.6%

2011
78.8%
84.2%
82.2%
7.6%

Career
59.0%
86.1%
78.3%
10.2%
Pujols
2010
76.0%
90.6%
85.4%
5.8%

2011
84.9%
91.2%
89.4%
3.9%

Career
84.9%
92.1%
86.1%
5.6%

Summary
                From what we have seen here Pujols has contact skills that make him stand out from the other two.  Votto has better results when he does make contact.  All three will knock it out of the park 20% of the time they hit a fly ball.  Overall these are three great players who have very close skill levels.  The overall results seem to say that Votto's ability to hit the ball with quality are leading to slightly better results than Pujols approach so I give the overall race to Votto by a nose over Pujols with Cabrera not a far third.

Saturday, May 7, 2011

Joey Votto's Awesome Pop Up Streak

All Reds fans would agree Joey Votto does lots of awesome things.  Recent focus has been put on that fact that Joey Votto has reached base in his first 32 games of the season.  That is moderately awesome by Vottoian standards. But even more impressive is his streak of avoiding pop ups.  Last year Joey was the only batter in both leagues to have a 0 pop ups(among those qualified for batting title).        

I checked today and there are 16 players yet to pop up in 2011.   Unsurprisingly, Joey Votto is one of those 16 along with Brandon Phillips.  That means for at least 182 regular season games, Joey Votto has not popped out.    He also did not pop out in the three post season games last year.

Avoiding pop outs is not new for Joey.  In 2009 he had the third lowest pop up % in the majors at 1.4% and in 2008 he popped up 3.8% of the time which was good for 15th in the majors.  The last time that anyone had a 0% pop out rate was Larry Bigbie for the Orioles back in 2004.  In fact Larry had a career long aversion to pop ups.  In his entire 392 game career he only popped out 1 time. 

Sunday, April 24, 2011

The Mystery of Travis Wood

The mystery of Travis Wood
Before yesterday’s game, I heard the word inconsistent before most every mention of Travis Wood’s name.  He actually has been in a consistent pattern of alternating quality starts with disaster starts (more ER than IP) every other time.  Good thing yesterday was the quality start turn and he delivered on schedule.  I am going to look a bit deeper into Travis Wood to see if we can tell more about his hot/cold start.

Travis Wood 2011 Starts
4/2 (7ip,1er, 0bb, 7k, 1hr)
4/8 (5ip,6er,2bb,4k,0hr)
4/13 (6.2ip,1er,3bb,5k,0hr)
4/18 (3.1ip,6er,1bb,3k,0hr)
4/23(6.1ip,3er,1bb,5k,1hr)

Is it bad luck?
                Overall Travis Wood's ERA is 5.40.  His xFIP (expected ERA with average defense and   10.5% of FB turn into HRs) is 3.70. His career ERA is 3.93 and career xFIP is 3.91.  So I think it is safe to say that he has been unlucky to thus far to be at a 5.40 ERA.
                Adding up his lines in the quality/disaster starts we get this:
Quality Starts: 20ip, 4bb, 17k, 2hr, 17H
Disaster Start: 8.1ip, 3bb, 7k, 0hr, 15H
From those two lines we can see his strikeout rate is about the same in both lines but he is walking more in the disaster starts.  He is also having a lot more balls fall for hits in the disaster starts.  So luck plays a role but his walks are not helping his cause either.

Pitch F/X  
                Below is Travis’s Pitch F/X data for 2010 per thanks to Texas Leaguers Pitch F/X site.   Last year Travis was throwing his 90MPH four seem fastball (FF) almost 2/3 of the time.  See the bottom of the posting for a pitch type key.




Primary Stuff
                The four seamer is Travis’s primary pitch.  One thing that stands out is he did not rely on it over 50% in the first and the third games.  We’ll see more on what he did in those two games in the secondary stuff section.   Nothing besides that usage pattern nothing seems to stand out on his primary fastball. 



Secondary stuff
                Below is a chart of all secondary pitches that Travis pitched over 10% of the time in his 2011 starts.  In the first game he was throwing his four seam fastball and his cutter for over 80% strikes.  He was obviously emulating his off-season workout partner Cliff Lee and he even got Lee like results.   Too bad that lasted only one game.
               In the third game he threw the change 22% of the time and mixed his pitches more.  He was effective with the change getting 6 whiffs.  I guess in this start he decided to emulate team mate Edison Volquez and it worked to get him a quality start.

 
Overall
                I think overall Travis is just fine.  He seems to have had two outings where he had better than Travis Wood stuff on 4/2 and 4/13.  The others days Travis Wood looked like an average Travis Wood.   When Travis is average his results will be well about a 4.00 ERA pitcher which will give you a quality start often but sometimes the balls will fall in as he is not overpowering. 
                Seeing this I feel good about what we have seen in Travis Wood thus far.  Only suggestion is we should send him between starts to the Phillies to see if he can emulate Cliff Lee some more.

Pitch Types Key
FA           Fastball
FF           4-seam Fastball
FT           2-seam Fastball
FC           Cut Fastball
SI            Sinker
SL            Slider
CU          Curveball
CH          Change-up

Tuesday, April 12, 2011

Optima Central Division Dashboard - Starters

This is the final of my belated NL Central preview posts.   In this post I am looking at the starters.   As I did in all three posts,  I am using Baseball Prospectus’s PECOTA pre-season forecasts from April 3rd.   The starters are ranked in the order of highest WARP starter to the lowest WARP starter based on the forecast from PECOTA. Here is the dashboard:

 
This starter chart surprised me a bit.  I figured the Brewers upgrade made them better but I did not expect them to project to be the best starting staff in the division by a wide margin.  Injuries should pull them back to the pack.  The Cubs and Cardinals create a 2nd tier.  The Reds and Houston form a 3rd tier.  Last are the Pirates who somehow manage to field a major league team with 3 starters projecting to be worse than Nelson Figueroa.

Notes on starters:
  • The Reds seem low to me.  I think the Reds make up for the top end quality with depth. So we can handle the inevitable injury better and that is not reflected here.  I think we have a better rotation than the Astros in reality.
  • The Cardinals seem to have the opposite type of rotation compared to the Reds.  They are great at the top but then drop off to the near replacement Kyle Lohse.   I don’t wish injuries on anyone but the Cardinals are running much more injury risk than the Reds in the rotation.
  • The Brewers are projecting to have the 1st, 3rd, and 4th best starters in the division.  Those are Greinke, Gallardo, and Marcum in that order. 
  • The Pirates have a horrible staff.  They have a 5th starter as their #2 and it gets worse from there.

Monday, April 11, 2011

Optima Central Division Dashboard - Relief Pitchers

This is part 2 of my series to look at the NL Central via a dashboard view.  The WARP below is based on the April 3 PECOTA forecast.  In part 1 we looked at the position players where the Reds are behind the Cardinals by just over 4.5 wins.  When we look at relievers the world returns to its natural order with the Reds clearly dominating.



The results are sorted by WARP for each pitcher in pen.  So the 1 column is the highest pitcher by WARP and the 2 column is the second highest in WARP.   This rank order view allows you to see how deep the pens are.  Overall the bullpens are expected to be a net loser versus replacement level driven by the two bad relief staffs of the Astros and Cardinals.    

Some notes on this chart:
  • The Reds show the deepest bullpen having the most valuable reliever at every rank 1 through 6.  Chapman (Reds Reliever 1) includes some starts but I think that is OK as one job of the bullpen is be backup starters and having a potential Cy Young level starter in your pen has value.
  • It is heartening to see how the Reds gain 3.7 wins on the Cardinals in the pen.  Should be fun to tune into the latter innings of Cardinals games this year.  Ryan Franklin has done his part to help the Cardinals live down to this projection.  
  • The Astros are terrible.
I will post part 3 on starters in the next few days.

Sunday, April 10, 2011

Optima Central Division Dashboard - Position Players

It is over one week into the season but I won’t let that stop from doing one last season preview.  In fact, I won’t stop there. I’m going to do a three part series on the subject.   In my quest to better understand the serious subject of the NL Central, I created a series of dashboards to get a look at the relative strengths and weaknesses of the NL Central teams.  I took the final PECOTA forecast from April 3rd and created a dashboard for position players, starters, and relievers to see the teams in a simple chart.   I’ll put up position players today, relievers on Monday, and starters a few days later.

Position Players Dashboard



Looking at the total WARP for position players you can see the Cardinals have a big hitting edge at 23.3 WARP.  The Reds follow in 2nd (18.6 WARP) followed closely by the Brewers (16.9 WARP) and Cubs (16.4 WARP).    As always, Pittsburgh and Houston trail.

A few things I take away from the chart:
  • Despite their reputation, the Cardinals don’t seem any more starry or scrubby than the rest of division.
  • The Reds have an opportunity in LF to improve. As I talked in my last post this forecast is probably too low.  Gomes is looking very good thus far both hitting for power (not surprising) and showing great patience at the plate (surprising).  Given plate discipline is driven by approach there is a good chance we'll see a sustainable improvement from Gomes.  If not LF is a position we have many options at today with Heisey, Alonso, Lewis, and more.
  • The difference makers for the Reds are Votto,  Phillips, Catchers, and Bruce.  Votto and Bruce for being good.  Catchers and Phillips for just not being bad as the rest of the division.
  • Third base is a position the division is pretty bunched up on. 
  • The Pirates are one Overbay short of fielding a decent team on the position player side of the ball.
  • Houston is really bad.

Friday, April 1, 2011

Reds as NL Central Favorites

The final PECOTA projected records are up at Baseball Prospectus.  Here are the  projected standings:

Cardinals 86-76
Brewers 85-77
Reds 82-80
Cubs 79-83
Pirates 71-91
Astros 65-97
 
As you can see this means the Reds need to close 4 games on the Cardinals and 3 on the Brewers in the Division.   Variance gives the Reds a chance but I want the Reds to be favorites.  So I have made a few adjustments as outlined below that seem quite reasonable to make the standings more "realistic".

Reds 84-78 (+2 Win) 
  • +.5 Gomes - PECOTA depth charts for some reason have Alonso as the primary left fielder and Gomes as a pinch hitter.  Alonso is worth only .3 wins in 335 PA.  Gomes is projected to be worth .5 wins in 167 PA.  So we gain a half win if Gomes doubles up to the 335 PA that Alonso is projecting.
  • +.5 Ondrusek - Logan Ondrusek is projecting -.6 WARP.  If he is that bad he'll be sent down and replaced by a replacement level pitcher. That is good for half of a win.
  • +1 Opening Day - We should have lost that game yesterday.  Took a career hit out of Hernandez to win.  So let's count that as one we stole from the Brewers off the top.
 
Cardinals 83-79 (-3 wins)
  • -2 Berkman - Berkman is projecting 2.8 wins in Right Field.  There is a good chance he'll fail in the outfield.  His replacements, John Jay and Allen Craig, are near replacement.  Pujols may be good enough to hold off Berkman from stealing any playing time at first.  So I'll count that as two wins less for the Cardinals.
  •   -.5 Rasmus - You can count on Tony LaRussa's to make some questionable playing time choices.  I translate this as Rasmus won't get to the 679 PAs that he is projected to PECOTA.  Rasmus projects to 1.7 WARP. I'll say that is a half win too high.
  • -.5 Holliday - Holliday had an appendectomy today.  He is setup for 4.2 WARP.  I think we can cut .5 wins off of that for time off and return to full health.

Brewers 83-79 (-2 wins)
  • -1 Opening Day - As explained in Reds section above.
  • -1 Starters - PECOTA shows every Brewer starter at 28-29 games started.  That is a lot of health for a team that already is down Greinke.  I'm going to count them -1 as their 6,7 starters are replacement at best.